The peer review process for The International Conference on Chemical and Material Engineering 2025 in conjuction with the International Symposium on Applied Chemistry (ICCME-ISAC 2025) is overseen by the conference organizers and proceedings editors to ensure the highest quality of published work.

All submissions undergo an initial screening to check for completeness and adherence to the conference submission guidelines. Manuscripts that pass this stage are assigned to an editor for further evaluation.

Editors evaluate submissions for suitability for peer review. If an editor is listed as an author or has a potential conflict of interest with a submission, another editor or a designated member of the Editorial Board will oversee the review process. Editorial decisions are informed by peer review reports, though editors may exercise discretion in accepting or rejecting submissions based on the overall merit and integrity of the manuscript

Conference papers are reviewed by Programme Chairs, Programme Committee members, and invited external reviewers. Each paper will receive at least two detailed peer review, and decisions are made based on the scientific merit, originality, and relevance of the work.

Authors receive reviewer comments along with the editorial decision. All reviewers are expected to provide clear recommendations supported by constructive comments suitable for authors.

Organizers and editors will complete a form detailing the peer review process followed. This documentation will be included in the published proceedings.

All conferences and reviewers are expected to adhere to the following standards:

• • All papers are evaluated fairly and without discrimination based on race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political beliefs.
  • Language and terminology used in reviews and publications must be respectful and inclusive.
  • All participants (authors, editors, reviewers) must comply with the conference’s ethical policies.
  • The organizers and editors reserve the right to investigate any allegations of misconduct.
  • All submissions and reviews must be conducted in English.

Reviewers must provide a clear recommendation and include sufficient supporting comments.

Only papers with clear, positive reviewer support will be accepted. Conference papers are expected to meet high academic standards, but reviewers will also consider the nature of conference presentations and allow reasonable flexibility (e.g., for review-type or background papers). However, no paper of low scientific quality will be accepted. Previously published papers will not be considered.

1. Technical Quality

• • Scientific rigor, accuracy, and correctness.
  • Clarity of expression, readability, and effective communication of concepts.
  • Adequate discussion of context and literature with proper referencing.

2. Scientific Value

• • Originality: Is the work novel and relevant?
  • Motivation: Is the research problem clearly justified?
  • Redundancy: Has similar work already been published?
  • Appropriateness of length based on content quality.

3. Presentation Quality

• • Title: Is it concise and representative of the content?
  • Abstract: Is it complete, self-contained, and informative for indexing?
  • Figures, tables, and captions: Are they clear, relevant, and properly labeled?
  • Text and mathematics: Are they concise and understandable? If revision is suggested, specific recommendations should be provided.
  • Conclusion: Is there a clear summary of findings and their significance?